Subject	388HP@406ft/lbs with no IC airflow. They were heatsoaked
Posted by	AshsZ (FABio) on February 03, 2003 at 10:02 AM
	This message has been viewed 76 times.
In Reply To	So really you haven't put down 410rwhp? (n/m) posted by Russ ZTT (Jax, Fl) on February 03, 2003 at 09:43 AM
Message	by the time I started making good power and making 12 more would have been very possible without any more tuning. But I would think that once I had good airflow over the IC's, I could have squeezed a couple more degrees of timing out for another ~10HP gain to put me at 500FWHP... With that and aquamist, I should be able to hit 420's. Add in the S14 IC's and make another 10 for 430RWHP. [ ashleypowers.com ] [ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] [ Zemulator Information Sheet ] "At the feast of ego, everyone leaves hungry."
Follow Ups	Wondering who has 500+hp to the crank with dynos to prove it - TwinTurboPete 00:51:51 02/03/03 who cares...but for your boredom ---> - Zeus 01:00:19 02/03/03 269mph,, lol :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:17:26 02/03/03 for some reason, my trackball mouse can't get passed 119mph (n/m) - Zeus 01:26:44 02/03/03 There is a bug in it.. i can hit 800's no problem:-) (n/m) - Stefen 02:01:48 02/03/03 444mph! is that a bad thing? (n/m) - inyrdrmz 15:11:10 02/03/03 baaah. 848 MPH. (n/m) - Altersys 01:38:03 02/04/03 500 crank? should be plenty, whp...not many (n/m) - Z-king 01:26:30 02/03/03 One of my mates is building a 700-800rwhp+ 300ZX - NitroPow 01:58:51 02/03/03 I made 426rwhp....do I qualify? - RUN-4-COVER 02:56:59 02/03/03 yeah, you should be over 500 at the crank. (n/m) - Snoguitar 03:02:28 02/03/03 I'll be hitting the dyno after the roads defrost - Turbodog (CT) 06:53:19 02/03/03 Greg(dallas) does. (n/m) - niXit 08:06:50 02/03/03 me! (n/m) - Bernie 09:11:24 02/03/03 I am close. 500FWHP = 410RWHP. (18% drivetrain loss) - AshsZ (FABio) 09:17:02 02/03/03 So really you haven't put down 410rwhp? (n/m) - Russ ZTT (Jax, Fl) 09:43:21 02/03/03 388HP@406ft/lbs with no IC airflow. They were heatsoaked - AshsZ (FABio) 10:02:03 02/03/03 So really you haven't put down 410rwhp? (n/m) - orion 10:36:58 02/03/03 ? did you read my post? (n/m) - AshsZ (FABio) 12:47:45 02/03/03 No, and you still dont have 500hp.. (n/m) - orion 16:16:33 02/03/03 Heh, a measly 36xHP under your belt with all those - AshsZ (FABio) 18:41:50 02/03/03 90hp loss in the drivetrain? (Eybrow is furled) - Turbodog (CT) 17:51:03 02/03/03 It is a theoretical value. I never said it was 100% true, - AshsZ (FABio) 18:36:30 02/03/03 Me too. (n/m) - CatDaddy(OKC) 09:37:18 02/03/03 With a conservative estimate of 25% drivetrain loss - FANTAZ(Power Supply Racing) 10:26:27 02/03/03 damn... 11.1 is damn fast for stock internals - down5hift 10:54:32 02/03/03 There are other cars making similar power on stock motor too - ZHOUND 11:00:23 02/03/03 Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the stock - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 12:25:19 02/03/03 Re: Which brings up the old debate, how much power can the s - ZHOUND 12:29:44 02/03/03 I will find out soon, 110K miles + 700 rwhp - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 12:36:04 02/03/03 Z-King pulled an 11.4 on a stock block... - X-STAT1C (Houston) 01:24:00 02/04/03 shit man! what kinda bolts on you have? (n/m) - Z. 16:08:50 02/03/03 I hate your sig man - aliaZ 21:51:02 02/03/03 Me :-) (n/m) - Good2Zya 13:50:00 02/03/03 433 RWHP here. Should be 500+ at crank. (n/m) - Joe (Ft. Laud) 15:59:13 02/03/03 Since he hasn't chipped in... timz makes 530rwhp. (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Hibernating) 17:34:11 02/03/03 I'll be there very soon... (n/m) - 1BADTTZ 20:09:31 02/03/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.